亲宝软件园·资讯

展开

Java字符串拼接 Java字符串拼接效率测试过程解析

玄同太子 人气:0

测试代码:

public class StringJoinTest {
  public static void main(String[] args) {
    int count = 10000;
    long begin, end, time;
    begin = System.currentTimeMillis();
    testString(count);
    end = System.currentTimeMillis();
    time = end - begin;
    System.out.println("拼接" + count + "次,String消耗时间:" + time + "毫秒");

    begin = System.currentTimeMillis();
    testStringBuffer(count);
    end = System.currentTimeMillis();
    time = end - begin;
    System.out.println("拼接" + count + "次,StringBuffer消耗时间:" + time + "毫秒");

    begin = System.currentTimeMillis();
    testStringBuilder(count);
    end = System.currentTimeMillis();
    time = end - begin;
    System.out.println("拼接" + count + "次,StringBuilder消耗时间:" + time + "毫秒");
  }

  private static String testStringBuilder(int count) {
    StringBuilder tem = new StringBuilder();
    for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) {
      tem.append("hello world!");
    }
    return tem.toString();
  }

  private static String testStringBuffer(int count) {
    StringBuffer tem = new StringBuffer();
    for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) {
      tem.append("hello world!");
    }
    return tem.toString();
  }

  private static String testString(int count) {
    String tem = "";
    for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) {
      tem += "hello world!";
    }
    return tem;
  }
}

测试结果:

结论:

  在少量字符串拼接时还看不出差别,但随着数量的增加,String+拼接效率显著降低。在达到100万次,我本机电脑已经无法执行String+拼接了,StringBuilder效率略高于StringBuffer。所以在开发过程中通常情况下推荐使用StringBuilder。

  StringBuffer和StringBuilder的区别在于StringBuffer是线程安全的。

加载全部内容

相关教程
猜你喜欢
用户评论